Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Utari Onzo for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
+1 For the State, the People and God; FOR THE ALLIANCE!!
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2016.01.13 14:09:16
|
2. Jin'taan for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
+1 For the State, For the People, For God!
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2016.01.13 14:06:03
|
3. Announcement:Unscheduled Downtime Extension GÇô July 15, 2015 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would appear that the Sleepers are awake.
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2015.07.15 21:39:04
|
4. The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: I agree that for a game to be successful it has to be fun and new entrants should actually have a chance of becoming competitive, but Eve has always been an PvP sandbox where artificial balancing is avoided. Battles have alwa...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2015.07.05 16:23:50
|
5. The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"73% of EVE characters stay in high security space. 62% of EVE subscribers barely PvP. 40% of all new accounts just "level up their Ravens". Probably that's why PvE content in EVE Online is sub-par and CCP is head over heels for PvP..." PvP the d...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2015.07.05 01:08:01
|
6. The Shrinking Sandbox - Eve by numbers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The game has been mostly over for some time really. A handful of Large Corporations control Eve space in the sense that their domination is pretty much unchallengeable. And they are bored. So they gank. Some of them have enough of a preferred stat...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2015.06.27 12:50:03
|
7. [SERVICE] PushX Hauling Services - in Sell Orders [original thread]
Top flight service. At least some of their pilots were part of an earlier service now defunct. They are conscientious and reliable. Recommended.
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2015.02.20 22:08:33
|
8. I'm sorry CCP, that we the pilots, are stoping EVE from growing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Odd sort of complaint in the title of this thread. A human soul in a capsuleer containment vessel. OP, Humanity did its best and here we are. They are too frail to matter to the Cosmos. Yes, we owe them. But... We have inherited destiny and t...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2013.05.02 17:20:00
|
9. Does anyone really play Eve with just 1 character and no alts. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just me, alone, on my one account. I'm too confused by my own actions to manage more than that...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2013.03.03 16:20:00
|
10. Every American EVE player should check this out. Also, everyone else... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"I canGÇÖt begin to imagine what life was like for the kids in the 60s, growing up and watching us send a man to space for the first time, landing a man on the moon, and broadcasting video back to an eager earth, far away." Do I truly remember? I...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.07.26 10:31:00
|
11. CCP - promoting AFK mining and botting with the new barges. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
dexington wrote: With all the people being butthurt and whining you just know ccp is doing the right thing. This.
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.07.26 10:17:00
|
12. Two serious questions for the "Highsec Carebear" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thor Kerrigan wrote: I would like to ask two questions to anyone who considers him/herself a "highsec carebear". 1. What exactly is a reasonable amount of risk? In other words, at which point would losing your most expensive ship (NPCs or Pl...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.07.04 19:01:00
|
13. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It isn't a specific mechanic. It is a result of the flood of isk unleashed by a combination of bounties and rewards provided by CCP (i.e., The State). That is and will always be the part of the sandbox that isn't player controlled. Its going to b...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 22:42:00
|
14. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Andar Purvanen wrote: Pipa Porto wrote: Which game mechanics have changed to make ganking easier or cheaper? Was it when Insurance was nerfed? Was it the several times Concord Reaction time was Buffed? Maybe it was wh...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 18:01:00
|
15. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Roime wrote: It's spelt cognitive dissonance. You seem to struggle with it, by the way. I'm a miner not a scowler
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 10:54:00
|
16. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Which game mechanics have changed to make ganking easier or cheaper? Was it when Insurance was nerfed? Was it the several times Concord Reaction time was Buffed? Maybe it was when bomeranging got declared an exploit for you...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 10:43:00
|
17. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: You're literally complaining about having to adapt. No, I'm complaining about the evolution toward a ganking format. CCP controls the game mechanics and there is plenty of evidence that this is exactly what they are doing.
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 10:07:00
|
18. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: One more try at this. What you're having issue with are the defining principles of EvE. You can play the game however you want. So can everyone else. Including Goonswarm. Putting bounties on Exhumers and Barges is currently h...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 02:19:00
|
19. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: Andar Purvanen wrote: Pipa Porto wrote: A properly tanked Hulk cannot be profitably suicide ganked (.5 space is breakeven, higher is a direct loss). True, but its not just Hulks. Anyone who loses a Hulk to a mere ga...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.28 00:35:00
|
20. Not another high sec miner thread.....Oh yes it is - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pipa Porto wrote: A properly tanked Hulk cannot be profitably suicide ganked (.5 space is breakeven, higher is a direct loss). True, but its not just Hulks. Anyone who loses a Hulk to a mere ganker must be either afk or have had some sort ...
- by Andar Purvanen - at 2012.06.27 21:45:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |